Hello!

You've landed in the archive of the Cambrian House community. We've kept some pages here for posterity but the community is no longer active. Now we market the technology that made our early crowdsourcing a success.

Can we help you get to Cambrian House the company? – Come on over.

Are you seeking crowdsourcing technology? – Check out Chaordix by Cambrian House.

Thanks for dropping by
The Cambrian House Crew

Close [x]
Cambrian House

Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration!
Thomas Edison

Cambrian House began as a crowdsourcing community using a wisdom of crowds based approach to discover new business and technology ideas. These pages are being kept online as a technology demo to showcase Chaordix™.

Looking to harness the power of your crowd? Find out about Chaordix™ - technology that enables enterprises to get the most out of crowdsourcing.

iJobSearch

kevinburns
kevinburns is offlineSend a Message to kevinburnsAdd kevinburns as a FriendSend a Hat Tip to kevinburns
  • Submitted by: kevinburns
  • Created: Aug 19, 2007, 7:28 am
  • Share on Facebook
  • Promote
 

Join Cambrian House

People

Ideas

Businesses

Connect with talented people. Collaborate on ideas. Realize your vision.
Not freeish. Not freesque. It's free!

The Idea

The iJobsSearch Site would have 3 features.

1.) Act as a repository for your personal information and your resume.
2.) Single click registration at all selected job search sites. Single click update of all information, resumes, etc. at all selected job search sites.
3.) Aggragate job listings from numerous job listing sites onto one page similar to iGoogle.

Revenue stream would be from yearly membership fees from job seekers.

I thought of this idea when I was...

Entering the same information at each Job Listings site, and having to log onto each site to view job listings.


Comments Posted

fossiloflife
fossiloflife Posted: August 22, 2007, 12:50 am

i see it as too messy man!

donh
donh Posted: August 22, 2007, 6:16 pm

I think an aggregator like this would be great. The big mistake I see is the revenue source. I don't think it would fly as a pay for use thing - job seekers are already trained to not pay for job search - employers pay. So, maybe advertising? There are many good advertisers for this type of site like education institutes, big employers, and other job sites.

steveszat
steveszat Posted: August 23, 2007, 10:18 am

Ive thought about something like this using HR-XML, but unfortunately not all of the major job search sites have implemented it yet. I think this is a great idea. I was just recently involved in a job search and it is a major pain in the ass trying to coordinate a job search over multiple job search websites.
And now for a comment about a comment. Fossil, are comments like that really constructive? What's too messy? How is it messy? What could be done to remedy it? Etc. If you are just posting comments to get points, at least type something interesting.

cRitter
cRitter Posted: August 23, 2007, 11:07 am

a very good angle. i typically leave my outdated resumes untouched until i need a new job because it's too much trouble to update all those sites. unfortunately, the idea seems more like a whim at this point.

Willcom
Willcom Posted: August 23, 2007, 3:21 pm

It is not a reason not to go for it but I believe job site aggregators already exist - see: http://www.simplyhired.com, http://www.indeed.com,

HerbCSO
HerbCSO Posted: August 23, 2007, 10:17 pm

A kayak.com for Monster, Dice & Co. Cool!

chrispoad
chrispoad Posted: August 25, 2007, 4:16 pm

Not sure it's original and agree with previous posters - you're suggesting reversing the existing commercial model in this space. Recruiters pay, not job seekers.

Cavanman
Cavanman Posted: August 25, 2007, 8:15 pm

Try Indeed.com One site that pull from all the employment sites. You can save job searches, set up rss feeds on them etc. In fact this is how I found my current job....

Kevin_Cox
Kevin_Cox Posted: August 26, 2007, 5:46 pm

Your code & proof you can do this is?

cRitter
cRitter Posted: August 26, 2007, 8:06 pm

i thought the objective was to update your resume on multiple sites (as opposed to searching for jobs on multiple sites).

PhilipH
PhilipH Posted: August 28, 2007, 8:22 am

An ok idea, but a very saturated market...

Brenden
Brenden Posted: August 28, 2007, 10:48 pm

there is to many job sites, i do not see a real big competitive advantage here.

mgruen
mgruen Posted: August 29, 2007, 1:44 am

no one will hire you with your resume EVERYWHERE. you'll look like a cheap commodity.

 

Post A Comment

Got something to say?
Log in to post a comment.