Hello!

You've landed in the archive of the Cambrian House community. We've kept some pages here for posterity but the community is no longer active. Now we market the technology that made our early crowdsourcing a success.

Can we help you get to Cambrian House the company? – Come on over.

Are you seeking crowdsourcing technology? – Check out Chaordix by Cambrian House.

Thanks for dropping by
The Cambrian House Crew

Close [x]
Cambrian House

The very premise of the site causes it to attract a community made up of smart creative people with very few trolls. The signal-to-noise ratio is extremely high on this site, and that's no small feat on the internet today
Micco

Cambrian House began as a crowdsourcing community using a wisdom of crowds based approach to discover new business and technology ideas. These pages are being kept online as a technology demo to showcase Chaordix™.

Looking to harness the power of your crowd? Find out about Chaordix™ - technology that enables enterprises to get the most out of crowdsourcing.

Java Physics Engine

cristimanole
cristimanole is offlineSend a Message to cristimanoleAdd cristimanole as a FriendSend a Hat Tip to cristimanole
  • Share on Facebook
  • Promote
 

Join Cambrian House

People

Ideas

Businesses

Connect with talented people. Collaborate on ideas. Realize your vision.
It's free! Like love in the sixties!

The Elevator Pitch

For application developers who need a pure java 3D physics engine the JPE is a great alternative to existing C engines that delivers the same functionality in their favourite language, object oriented. Unlike C engines our product is object oriented, easy to be integrated.

The Idea

Develop a proprietary 3D engine in java to be used mainly in applications for limited capability devices like phones but not limited to them.

Java is already in the game market and it's a shame there is no quality physics engine.

I thought of this idea when I was...

searching for such an engine... there is no such thing. Work is in progress for porting a C engine (ODE), but a new OO engine should be done.


Comments Posted

vanhees
vanhees Posted: August 7, 2007, 5:25 am

well then go for it
Tommy

cristimanole
cristimanole Posted: August 7, 2007, 5:50 am

i'm looking for supporters :)

evmark
evmark Posted: August 8, 2007, 4:51 pm

what about the java 3d (sun library)

evmark
evmark Posted: August 8, 2007, 4:53 pm

ok not only 3d but physics, for devices with small footprint

firefox
firefox Posted: August 8, 2007, 9:21 pm

nice utility. But sorry man am not a techie in Java

cristimanole
cristimanole Posted: August 9, 2007, 2:12 am

not a 3d engine, but a 3d physics engine. if you can find one, great, lemme know cause i didn't manage to do that :)

also, small footprint is the main target. I really believe in this :)

PhilipH
PhilipH Posted: August 9, 2007, 3:00 pm

Sounds like a good idea; I'm afraid I'm not in the right place to offer support though. My physics is great, but my Java skills are somewhat lacking... Good luck with it anyway!

saigon
saigon Posted: August 11, 2007, 11:53 am

revolutionary...watch out for BIll Gates!

Douglas_Perry
Douglas_Perry Posted: August 11, 2007, 3:43 pm

Maybe Microsoft would support your idea.

cristimanole
cristimanole Posted: August 12, 2007, 6:02 am

you very much convinced me to do this :). i'm kinda disappointed it this idea didn't rank better :)

Myla_HB
Myla_HB Posted: August 12, 2007, 9:36 pm

The world needs this!

fullmentaljacket
fullmentaljacket Posted: August 13, 2007, 5:07 am

This may be good as a teaching resource, but in my own experience as a researcher in theoretical physics until recently, many academics still use Fortran and would be reluctant to change. A colleague of mine who is a physicist and a techie spent a long time writing programmes in C++, only to conclude eventually that the extra time spent on object orientation wasn't really worth it, and the Fortran quick and dirty approach is usually best. Teaching and visualisation is a different matter, though, and a single comprehensive resource could be very valuable if the interface was designed for non-Java techies.

ccozad
ccozad Posted: August 13, 2007, 2:24 pm

Open a sourceforge project and get going! :) Post a link when your source forge project is approved.

Kevin_Cox
Kevin_Cox Posted: August 14, 2007, 12:30 am

"Microsoft would support your idea." What was that a joke. They are against each other competitively.

A 3d engine and or 3d physics engine in java would be hard to make.
Considering how slow Java is with that type of work. This is one of the reasons why there are ports.

I also know I have seen some pure Java engines floating around not sure if they were ever open sourced. So, this has been done and possibly there is a open source version.

Kevin_Cox
Kevin_Cox Posted: August 14, 2007, 12:39 am

Also, if all you need is a particle system there is one free for personal use at: http://www.indietechnologies.com
But it is not intended to be a full physics system no IK, no rag doll, etc...

In_a_Sense
In_a_Sense Posted: August 14, 2007, 5:48 am

..agrees with fullmentaljacket!

bcforrester
bcforrester Posted: August 15, 2007, 10:30 am

Why would you do a propriety engine and not open source? Seems to me you could get much greater support for development if open.

 

Post A Comment

Got something to say?
Log in to post a comment.