Money for nothing - Warren Buffet on why most CEO compensation models are broken
Monday, May 7th, 2007CEO compensation plans should be simple.
Berkshire Hathaway’s is among the simplest. Warren Buffet gets paid the same way as every other Berkshire shareholder - when the stock goes up. Other then his modest $100K salary, that’s all there is. It’s simple, shareholder aligned, and you could write it on the back of a table napkin.
Contrast that with today’s overly complex, unwieldy, misaligned CEO comp plans. Take the ever popular 10 year, fixed-price options plan (who wouldn’t). This plan locks in the value of stock options at a fixed price over time. On the surface this seems reasonable - to get a bigger payout, the CEO needs the stock to increase in price.
The problem is that the CEO can increase the stock price without delivering any value.
With fixed price options, many CEOs are taking the easy way out and simply using the company’s retained earnings to buy back stock at the end of the year, thus reducing the number of shares outstanding. Simultaneously, this increases the price of the company’s stock, while delivering no value to the shareholder (in what might have otherwise been dividends). This manager owner conflict is also never mentioned in proxy materials that request approval of a fixed-price option plan.
Getting fired today can also be particular bountiful for CEOs. Save for Bob Nardelli of HomeDepot, I can’t think of too many jobs that pay $210 million for a job poorly done.
Warren’s point is many of the models used today to compensate CEOs are misaligned with shareholders (fixed price options being one of them).
Warren feels that a shareholder revolt is necessary to bring back sanity to what is increasingly becoming a crazy world when it comes to CEO comp plans. By shining a light on the issues plaguing the industry, we can hopefully soon see real change in how CEOs are compensated and aligned with shareholder interests.
